I know xkcd is already over-the-top geeky, but this one really takes the cake:
« J. G. Ballard, RIP | Main | How much of the NC "Education Lottery" goes to education? »
20 April 2009
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341d0fa353ef01156f3a2881970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference So does that mean they're not countably infinite?:
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Recent Comments
- Jeff on Yay not II
- Jack on Well, that was amusing. Maybe we should have read the instructions.
- Free and Clear on It's N.C. sales tax holiday weekend...
- Joe on Good news/bad news
- Foilwoman on Good news/bad news
- Joe on Separated at Birth?
- Lenore on Separated at Birth?
- Phil on Separated at Birth?
- Joe on So many wackos, so little time
- Toastie on Makes me want to go watch _Shakes the Clown_
man I loved this one. I only kind of think I get it, but I still love it.
Posted by: Richard Johnguy | 20 April 2009 at 03:35 PM
In the last panel, shouldn't the sheep still be going backwards?
I guess it depends on whether he's using little endian or big endian {grin}
http://www.cs.umass.edu/~Verts/cs32/endian.html
Mark
Posted by: Mark | 21 May 2009 at 05:35 PM